START and the future of deterrence

  • 325 Pages
  • 0.60 MB
  • 99 Downloads
  • English
by
Macmillan , London
Nuclear warfare., Deterrence (Stra
StatementMichael J.Mazarr.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsU263
The Physical Object
Pagination(vi,325)p. ;
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14999514M
ISBN 10033352392X

Examining the future of nuclear deterrence in the s and beyond, this book outlines aspects of the evolving strategic environment. It also projects the. Get this from a library. START and the future of deterrence. [Michael J Mazarr] -- In this timely piece on how the policy of deterrence is likely to evolve, Mazaar's thesis rests upon the assumption that there will be a START (Strategic Arms Reduction Talks) treaty and that it will.

The first half of the book gives the history of deterrence, describes different types, and contrasts the concept with its competitors, including prevention, pre-emption, and compellence. He also draws on the literature from criminology, which is rarely considered in the international context.5/5(3).

Examining the future of nuclear deterrence in the s and beyond, this book outlines aspects of the evolving strategic environment.

It also projects the likely future of deterrence strategies and strategic force postures. Other topics, such as the Soviet nuclear doctrine are also covered.

The book opens with an excellent summary of deterrence theory before laying out the history of the U.S. nuclear umbrella to Japan and South Korea.

Roehrig uses this accessible blend of theory and history to explore the future of both extended deterrence and the nuclear umbrella.

Start and the Future of Deterrence | Michael J. Mazarr (auth.) | download | B–OK. Download books for free. Find books. The Future of Extended Deterrence: The United States, NATO, and Beyond - Kindle edition by von Hlatky, Stéfanie, Wenger, Andreas.

Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading The Future of Extended Deterrence: The United States, NATO, and cturer: Georgetown University Press.

As an approach to security policy, deterrence still has a role to play, although not the role it was granted during the Cold War. Deterrence still helps explain why states, and even non-state actors, fail to act against the interests of others.

Actors may be deterred because they have constructed a possible future in which they are worse off.

Download START and the future of deterrence FB2

Short, insightful, and well written. You can't ask for much more from a book on international political theory.

Published inDeterrence addresses the theory of deterrence as it was shortly the United States invaded Iraq, animated by the alternative idea of pre-emption. Freedman is not beholden to a single theory START and the future of deterrence book international relations unlike many other scholars in his field/5.

Roundtable: The Future of Extended Deterrence By Stéfanie von Hlatky & Andreas Wenger Georgetown University Press (August 4, ), $, pages. The Future of Extended Deterrence brings together experts and scholars from the policy and academic worlds to provide a theoretically rich and detailed analysis of post–Cold War nuclear weapons policy, nuclear deterrence, alliance commitments, nonproliferation, and missile defense in NATO but with implications far beyond.

The contributors. The U.S.

Description START and the future of deterrence EPUB

needs to start writing the guidelines for 21 st century strategic deterrence, focusing on methods beyond nuclear options. Estimated time to read: 11 minutes. By Aryan Dale and Brendon Herbeck. Introduction For half of the 20th Century, Warsaw Pact and NATO countries alike wrote the book for how deterrence theory should be applied.

The Future of Extended Deterrence brings together experts and scholars from the policy and academic worlds to provide a theoretically rich and detailed analysis of post-Cold War nuclear weapons policy, nuclear deterrence, alliance commitments, nonproliferation, and missile defense in NATO but with implications far beyond.

The contributors. This essay is not itself a book on the future of deterrence and warfare, centered on missile defense; rather, it is a sketch of the current situation regarding tactical and strategic missile defense, with indications of the relationship to deterrence and warfare.

Under START, the multiplier of DBL due to the self-imposed vulnerability of. As a concept, deterrence has launched a thousand books and articles. It has dominated Western strategic thinking for more than four decades. In this important and groundbreaking new book, Lawrence Freedman develops a distinctive approach to the evaluation of deterrence as both a state of mind and a strategic option.

This approach is applied to post-cold war crisis. The Future of Nuclear Deterrence. Note: Dr. Ford made the following remarks on Mato a NATO Nuclear Policy Symposium in Tirana, Albania, on “NATO Nuclear Policy After Lisbon – Continuity or Change?” Good morning.

Let me begin by offering my thanks to the NATO organizers and our gracious Albanian hosts here in Tirana. The Deterrence Theory Vs. Deterrence Words | 4 Pages. Classic Deterrence Theory A rational person is thought to measure both the gains and losses before committing a crime and would more than likely to be deterred from violating the law they believed the loss was greater than the gain according to the deterrence theory.

Focused deterrence strategies generally target a specific type or group of offenders, such as youth gang members or repeat violent offenders. Many focused deterrence interventions have primarily targeted incidents of homicide and serious violence (criminal activities that usually involve chronic offenders) in urban settings (Kennedy ).

Some. Strategic Deterrence: Past, Current, and Future. PANEL ON DETERRENCE CONCEPT UPDATES AND APPROACHES. Michael Wheeler, senior research staff, Institute for Defense Analyses, led the panel titled “Deterrence Concept Updates and Approaches” at.

The essence of deterrence is to dissuade an adversary from taking actions inimical to the interests of a country. India wants to deter Pakistan from supporting Non State Actors(NSAs). The military objectives of Cold Start inkle. The NOOK Book (eBook) of the Deterrence: Its Past and Future-Papers Presented at Hoover Institution, November by George P.

Shultz, Sidney D. Drell, Due to COVID, orders may be delayed. Thank you for your : George P. Shultz. The Future of Extended Deterrence brings together experts and scholars from the policy and academic worlds to provide a theoretically rich and detailed analysis of post–Cold War nuclear weapons policy, nuclear deterrence, alliance commitments, nonproliferation, and missile defense in NATO but with implications far beyond.

The contributors Brand: Georgetown University Press. This book recommends a renewed intellectual effort on nuclear deterrence.

The rea-sons, spelled out in Chapter Two, are many, but the core principle is straightforward: As long as nuclear weapons are around, even in small numbers, deterrence is the safest doctrine to deal with them.3 This principle is easier to embrace in theory than it is toFile Size: 1MB.

Tailored Deterrence of New Actors. Tailored deterrence is, in the words of Dr. Jerrold Post, an actor-specific set of deterrence capabilities designed to influence a specific leader or leader’s group.

Deterrence strategy may be tailored to the actors to be deterred, the capabilities needed to execute this strategy, and to the points in ongoing. Deterrence Now book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. With stocks reduced, and plans revised, relations between states with nucle /5(5).

The following is part of a series of thought pieces authored by members of the START Consortium. These editorial columns reflect the opinions of the author(s), and not necessarily the opinions of the START Consortium.

This series is penned by scholars who have grappled with complicated and often politicized topics, and our hope is that they will foster thoughtful.

From he was Director, Threats and Future Requirements for Boeing, Missile Defense Division, and has over 30 year's experience as a strategic level researcher and analyst.

Researched developments and trends in advanced nuclear weapon technologies, delivery systems, space, cyber and implications for future nuclear/non-nuclear warfare. Start and the Future of Deterrence.

Start and the Future of Deterrence pp at least between major powers.

Details START and the future of deterrence PDF

The key question to be addressed by this book is how nuclear deterrence, a critical linchpin of the trend making war infeasible, will evolve in that context. Mazarr M.J. () The Requirements of Deterrence. In: Start and the Author: Michael J.

Mazarr. Deterrence in relation to criminal offending is the idea or theory that the threat of punishment will deter people from committing crime and reduce the probability and/or level of offending in is one of five objectives that punishment is thought to achieve; the other four objectives are denunciation, incapacitation (for the protection of society), retribution and rehabilitation.

Future Challenges in Operationalizing Nuclear Deterrence. Maj. Gen. William A. Chambers, Assistant Chief of Staff for Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration Remarks at the 3rd Annual Nuclear Deterrence Summit, Alexandria, Va., Feb. 18. Turning to the Middle East, he examines the differences in Israeli and Egyptian strategic doctrines prior to the start of the major conventional conflicts in that region.

Mearsheimer then critically assays the relative strengths and weaknesses of NATO and the Warsaw Pact to determine the prospects for conventional deterrence in any future crisis.Deterrence theory is the idea that an inferior force, by virtue of the destructive power of the force's weapons, could deter a more powerful adversary, provided that this force could be protected against destruction by a surprise attack.

This doctrine gained increased prominence as a military strategy during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons and is related to, but .deterrence theory is correct, then to reduce crime, the correctional system should be orga-nized to maximize the pain of crime and to minimize its benefits.

Its whole aim should be to scare people straight—those who have engaged in crime (specific deterrence) and those who are thinking about committing crime (general deterrence).